Statistics detailing the number of people in Hertfordshire who were prevented from voting at this month's local elections - because they lacked the required photo ID - have been released.
New laws introduced by the government meant that photographic ID was required to vote for the first time in these elections.
Across elections in Stevenage, North Herts, Welwyn Hatfield, and St Albans, 184 people were denied a ballot paper because they lacked the required photo ID.
In total across those areas, 445 people were initially turned away from polling stations because they lacked the required ID. However, 261 of those people later returned with acceptable ID and were issued with ballot papers.
READ MORE: Looking for a weekend walk? Homegrown app helps you explore the Herts countryside
The figures per local authority were as follows
St Albans City & District
Electors initially turned away for lacking acceptable ID - 196
Electors returning with acceptable ID - 109
Electors who did not return - 87 (0.3 per cent of total who turned up at polling stations)
North Herts
Electors initially turned away - 118
Electors returning - 64
Electors who did not return - 54 (0.3 per cent of total)
Welwyn Hatfield
Electors initially turned away - 104
Electors returning - 74
Electors who did not return - 30
Stevenage Borough Council
Electors initially turned away - 27
Electors returning - 14
Electors who did not return - 13
The introduction of stricter voter ID laws has proved controversial. While the government argued that it would cut down on voter fraud, opponents say that this was not a major issue.
According to the Electoral Commission, the police have received 1,386 reports of alleged electoral fraud since 2018. These have resulted in nine convictions and six police cautions.
On the day of the elections, a spokesperson for the Electoral Commission said: “We already know from our research that the ID requirement posed a greater challenge for some groups in society, and that some people were regrettably unable to vote today as a result.
“It will be essential to understand the extent of this impact, and the reasons behind it, before a final view can be taken on how the policy has worked in practice and what can be learned for future elections.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here